Rare complication of skin necrosis after endoscopic debridement and cutaneo-fascial suture for a massive Morel-Lavallée lesion in Korea: a case report

Article information

J Trauma Inj. 2023;36(3):304-309

Publication date (electronic) : 2023 August 25

doi : https://doi.org/10.20408/jti.2023.0007

Youngmin Kim, MD¹, Jayun Cho, MD¹, Myung Jin Jang, MS², Kang Kook Choi, MD^,1,2

¹Department of Trauma Surgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea

²Department of Traumatology, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea

Correspondence to Kang Kook Choi, MD Department of Traumatology, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, 21 Namdong-daero 774beon-gil, Namdong-gu, Incheon 21565, Korea Tel: +82-32-460-3010 Email: choikangkook@gilhospital.com

Received 2023 February 7; Revised 2023 May 19; Accepted 2023 May 30.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A Morel-Lavallée lesion (MLL) is a pathologic fluid collection within an abnormally formed space, resulting from an internal degloving injury between the muscle fascia and subcutaneous fat layer [1]. Due to its resistance to conservative treatments such as drainage or compression dressing, various therapeutic methods have been developed for MLL [2,3]. However, no standardized guidelines currently exist. Recently, endoscopic debridement and cutaneo-fascial suture (EDCS) has been introduced for the treatment of MLL [4–8]. This procedure is known to be effective for large MLLs that are resistant to conservative treatments. However, limited reports are available on potential complications. The authors present a case of skin necrosis following EDCS for a massive MLL.

CASE REPORT

A 43-year-old man was transferred to Gachon University Gil Medical Center (Incheon, Korea) following a pedestrian traffic accident. His hemodynamic status was stable. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed multiple pelvic fractures and contrast extravasation in the pelvic cavity. The patient underwent angioembolization to address the pelvic bleeding. Hemorrhage from the bilateral internal iliac arteries was observed and embolized. The CT scan showed hematomas in the bilateral hips (Fig. 1). On day 5 of hospitalization, the patient reported pain and fluctuation in both hips. Based on the CT scan findings and physical examination, the authors diagnosed the fluctuation as an MLL. EDCS was planned for the lesion, and the operation was performed on the same day. In the operating room, MLL was noted on the right (40×50 cm) and left (40×60 cm) hip/flank (Fig. 2). A 2-cm skin incision was made for the scope trocar, and two additional skin incisions were made for the working ports. Initially, debridement was performed using a sponge stick (Fig. 3). After debridement, saline irrigation was conducted through the skin incision (Fig. 4). Following debridement and irrigation, trocars were placed, and CO₂ gas inflation was performed. The gas-inflated pressure was approximately 10 mmHg, and it did not interfere with visibility or worsen the wound. Under videoscopy, additional debridement and hemostasis were performed (Fig. 5). The subcutaneous fat layer was attached to the fascia with an endoscopic suture using absorbable suture material, and video-assisted cutaneo-fascial suturing from the skin to fascia was performed using 1-0 nylon (Fig. 6). Two drains were placed in the cavity. The cutaneo-fascial sutures were removed sequentially over 2 weeks. After the stitch removal, necrosis of the skin (5 cm in diameter) was found on the right hip (Fig. 7). The lesion was debrided, and negative-pressure wound therapy was applied. The patient was discharged on day 32 of the hospital stay after improvement of the skin defect.

Fig. 1.

Computed tomography scan shows hematomas (arrows) in the bilateral hip. (A) Axial cut. (B) Coronal cut.

Fig. 2.

Morel-Lavallée lesions are observed on the (A) the right (40×50 cm) and (B) the left (40×60 cm) hip/flank.

Fig. 3.

Debridement performed with a sponge stick on the left hip/flank. (A) Sponge stick. (B) Gauze debridement with sponge stick. (C) Laparoscopic grasper with gauze. (D) Gauze debridement with laparoscopic grasper.

Fig. 4.

Saline irrigation through the skin incision on the left hip/flank.

Fig. 5.

Additional debridement and hemostasis under videoscope.

Fig. 6.

Cutaneo-fascial sutures and drains on (A) the right and (B) the left hip/flank.

Fig. 7.

Skin necrosis on the right hip after the procedure.

DISCUSSION

MLL arises due to shearing injury and typically affects the greater trochanter, flank, and buttock [9]. Early treatment of MLL is crucial, as untreated cases may progress to further tissue necrosis and encapsulation, ultimately leading to serious infection [8,10,11].

The treatment options for MLL can be categorized into conservative (or nonsurgical therapy) and surgical intervention. Initially, conservative therapy involves external compression and percutaneous drainage [12–14]. While this approach is simple and minimally invasive, it is considered less effective than surgery and requires a longer treatment period for advanced MLL cases [5,7].

Surgical treatment should be considered for advanced or large MLLs. These often involve substantial amounts of necrotic debris, unabsorbed turbid exudate, and organized capsules. Nickerson et al. [15] demonstrated that the volume of fluid aspirated from an MLL is associated with its resolution rate. In their study, 83% of patients with more than 50 mL of fluid aspirated from the MLL experienced recurrence following percutaneous drainage.

Open debridement and primary closure is the traditional surgical approach for managing MLL. However, the long skin incision and subsequent pain are drawbacks of this method. EDCS has been developed to address these disadvantages associated with open debridement [4–8]. As previously reported, the EDCS technique shares similar components with open debridement, including drainage of all fluid collections, endoscopic removal of necrotic tissue, endoscopic or endoscopy-assisted suturing, and compression dressing [4–8]. Regarding endoscopic or endoscopy-assisted suture, a suture between the subcutaneous fat layer and fascia within the cavity is preferable to a cutaneo-fascial suture. However, these authors had to employ both methods due to the friable and thin nature of the subcutaneous fat layer. While previous reports have described the use of numerous cutaneo-fascial sutures [4–8], we placed only 3 or 4 similarly-sized cutaneo-fascial sutures in the MLLs, as this was sufficient for approximation between the subcutaneous fat layer and the fascia. An excessive cutaneo-fascial suture may lead to complications such as pain, scarring, infection, and skin necrosis. The larger the MLL, the more advantageous EDCS becomes.

Unlike conventional laparoscopic surgery, no standard trocar insertion position exists for EDCS in the treatment of MLL. However, the following approach may be optimal. After closing the small skin incision from a previous debridement, the authors inserted three trocars along the long axis of the MLL to accommodate a scope and two working ports. Multiple endoscopic sutures were placed using a scope, which was inserted through the three trocars in a rotating manner. For MLLs larger than this, additional trocars might be required.

In this patient, a serious complication developed in the form of skin necrosis on the right hip, although this was relatively small compared to the total MLL (40×50 cm). Several possible causes existed for the skin necrosis, which may have occurred due to a combination of factors. First, the location of the necrotic lesion was the most friable site of the wound, situated in the central portion of the MLL. As a result, this area would have received less blood supply than other parts of the lesion. Based on this hypothesis, employing a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure in this case may have reduced the extent of skin necrosis. Second, the lesion was located on the greater trochanter of the femur, which is the most prominent portion anatomically. The skin and subcutaneous fat layers on the greater trochanter of the femur are thinnest in the hip area, making it particularly susceptible to necrosis. Other potential causes could relate to the surgical procedure. The cutaneo-fascial suture may have been too tight, leading to skin ischemia. Additionally, the debridement might have been too excessive, causing injury to the affected area. Given these concerns, practitioners must carefully consider these factors when implementing the EDCS technique to prevent skin necrosis. Proper attention to the tension of cutaneo-fascial sutures and the extent of debridement can help minimize potential complications and ensure a more successful outcome. Fortunately, the wound in the present case improved after using negative-pressure wound therapy alone without the need for a skin graft.

This study describes the successful management of a very large MLL using EDCS. Skin necrosis is a potential complication following the procedure. Surgeons must exercise caution when performing EDCS on vulnerable MLL lesions.

Article information Continued